sequels to ghost stories
always have that one little boy who learned his lesson after it was presumably too late but he redeems himself after that someone else might learn from his mistake as they make it on their own., he may have wanted to be the flowers on his mother's grave, or whisper on a prettier boy's neck on a crisp night that breaks the summer heat for the winter to come, but he was always wrong and that is how we come to the ghosts. We expect that what comes after must be the impression of what came before, that we might not finish what we started will become another's problem, and how we treat the ones we should love will determine how we see them again and again. Sequels to ghost stories always tell us something else had happened or was missing, but they don't expect us to read into that. The narrative is supposed to make us feel what's not there or else tells us it was missing. I want to write a ghost story sequel about how ghosts can't see one another in ways that even the living don't: a concerned look might be the windows shatter, loneliness expressed as a tub flooding over, and mourning the murder-suicide of a wife & husband means the chairs are thrown across the room, but each time the paranormal occurs to itself it is as quickly explained away by science, by common sense, by another moment silenced by the arrival of another moment. I think that my ghost story sequel would be about how lonely it is to live with your mistakes and in the end I would teach someone what those mistakes are and then I could move on to sharing everything I did right and how that makes other people wrong. |
PoetArchives
February 2018
Categories |